Democracy: Foreword by Kit Carruthers
The initial release from tyranny that was democracy was essential, the founding fathers done good. They did a lot of fucking up, however the initial full break from all concepts of tyranny was correct action. In the past, no one man simply gets to sit at the top in charge of what we do to the people, the people decide what we do to the people... Correct action, correct philosophy. Correct subjectivity, imperfect system, it released humanity.
In modern times, it all falls apart, now the people are in charge of what we do to the people, there's simply far too much stupidity within the people for them to properly understand their carefully crafted list of all of the things we want to do to the people for some reason.
Putting the very leadership to a vote, in modern times, now that we have been released from tyranny, is where it falls apart the most dramatically, almost entirely to the bottom. We're all conditioned to think, and the nature of people who lack perceptual filter bypass confirms this thinking for all people within lack of perceptual filter bypass that the idea of a person who is not automatically corrupted by power if given total authority is an impossible concept. The rest of us don't get to talk to you, we don't get to say we know they exist because a good one third of us lack of perceptual filter bypass people and about one tenth of people who do not bypass their perceptual filters would have no desire to serve themselves with their power, they'd just do their job. We'd like our power, we'd use our power correctly, we wouldn't be corrupted by our power, some of us may have a little fun with our power but it most certainly wouldn't be corrupted fun enter myself into my own personal prison of ego reinforcement and self hatred upon society it would be quite harmless, generally only interpersonal, a good chunk of us would never even have fun with our power. In addition to this, we all now live in a society of interconnection and information, the vast majority of us understand the concept of what we could ever get away with, the vast majority of us understand the significance of being remembered forever relating to what we achieve strictly for ourselves upon society for thirty years. We know the second we express any disagreement with you people we enter into ego battle. "Oh? Give me a list. Who do you think should float on themselves? Is it you? Do you think you should float on yourself?"
Within rest of the world, obviously, it is in fact true, the majority of people who wish to destroy democracy wish to destroy democracy in order to impose hard racist social conservative fascism. However a smaller segment of those who wish to destroy democracy wish to destroy democracy because it keeps leading to this fascist idiot majority who wants to destroy democracy gaining power. Yes, America, it is true, in rest of the world it's just okay to go saying you want to destroy democracy, it isn't such an outrageous statement, it isn't a thing people fling as if it is the ultimate insult to a politician.
Once everything is properly sorted out, we have all come to the understanding of the appropriate things we do to the people. Everything is sorted, everything makes sense, we understand why we're not supposed to do stupid things to the people, this can just be set in place. The entire concept of democracy does not need to disappear, it can be utilized at the local level for economic policy, certain legal policy, regulation policy, grand project idealism... The kind of thing we should be interested in elevating somebody's ego with our collective approval over. Not... Not the current people who's egos we elevate into a position of corruption and tyranny with our collective approval.
Obviously... This whole fucking project is democracy's fault. This is all democracy's fault. Yeah just go tell the world this is the only way to run a country, the political system of nobody can stop the collapse.
You have to figure it out, you have to figure out how to maintain your false presence and empty words of lies to the general public who knows they get to see everything, they see all of it and they decide whether or not you're allowed to remain in politics. If anything in politics were ever actually true it wouldn't be legitimate.
You don't just get to speak your politics, you speak your party's politics, stepping up to the podium and telling people what's actually on your mind not only destroys your career but destroys who you are in the eyes of everyone who loves you. You don't want to speak this party's politics? Well, now you have to find another party who's politics you'd rather speak, however you have to figure out how to do so within the barriers of passive aggressive society speak for politicians, otherwise everybody will be outraged that you have presented what we always knew was a thing that was real and we always acknowledge we know but we don't want to acknowledge that we acknowledge that there's an imaginary barrier of things that don't mean anything to anybody and nobody cares about. So we'll just not trust you and it's things like this, these switching parties things, that confirm why we don't trust you. The only way we're going to trust you is if you maintain false vessel of the party as we know we can't trust you because you're a false vessel of the party. So, now you have no choice but to be a lying conniving false image politician who spouts nothing but bullshit, no matter how idealistic you were when you got into politics, this is your only option.
A politician always needs to keep their interests a secret, if you reveal you have a motivation you're automatically seen as evil by everybody who does not line up by that motivation, and so you must keep all motivation to yourself, you must keep everybody who's backing you all to yourself. You have no choice but to enter into the evil people backing you and providing you with motivations because that's the system. Sometimes you like these people, sometimes you don't mind so much that these people are backing you, sometimes it might leak out that you like these people, now suddenly you're the hard lined evil psychopathic politician who sells out to the evil system. If it doesn't leak, you're just one of the others, the hiding his evil secrets that he may well be a hard lined evil psychopathic politician who sells out to the evil system.
If it is revealed that you live a life of interpersonal interaction, any interpersonal interaction whatsoever, you will be seen as non-stable, unpredictable. This man does not have his head on straight, he's not thinking about his important job he's off fucking his wife he's going to small gatherings of friends. It enters improperly semi-consciously, something about acknowledging this is a person hits you wrong. I mean we've seen all of the plastered headlines about when politicians are exposed as doing things that are people things and these people things are never good. Please no life, no emotions, no opinions, we need blank plastered face, inanimate politician, that way we know we can trust you that way we know we can't trust you.
Never the less, you decided to get into politics, you fully understood the system, you chose to enter into the system.
The powerful nations, generally American nations, give the seemingly harmless labels to their militaristic action: "We are protecting our interests." Well of course you are, how could anybody have a problem with something that protects? Look at the word: Interests. Think about it. What are you protecting? You are not protecting yourself, you are protecting the things you want. You are utilizing threat to secure what you want from other nations. You want to insert yourself in the nation, make them what you want them to be whether they like it or not, and more importantly... Take what you want whether they like it or not. Resources, trade routes, leverage. Stabilization and humanitarian intervention, also, obviously, a clever trick, labels that hide intention within a modernistic framework, to the masses everything still looks completely civil. If you hear a label, any label at all, within the world of international politics, it is strategic wording, and strategic wording is only used to manipulate. If they could tell you straight up what they were doing they never would have bothered preparing a safety label.
Only a conservative minded person would declare "It is our moral imperative to insert ourselves without asking. Help another, and... Probably protect our interests." While obviously a liberal minded person would go along with UN action, would assist people who are crying out to their nation for help, only a conservative... A... Neoconservative, would assume not only is the rest of the world their right to coddle, but just skip past the part where anybody's asking and assume they will be loved for it. As all of their conservative base yells at the dirty brown bastards for being ungrateful. We CLEARLY told us you love us for this, we CLEARLY can't see anything but our own ego, assholes. The neoconservative American would state "We are in the right for wishing to serve ourselves and rape the planet into oblivion. Our values are inherently the only good in the world, our values are what stabilize the world. We must remain stronger, richer and fatter than the rest of the world because the rest of the world needs us this way. We need to look as oblivious to ourselves as possible. Our little delusional dream world, this is how we've been operating since the Cold War."
Often times, revealing the truth of your action destroys the outcome of your action. You tell the people what you're doing to them, somebody who doesn't like it is going to change what it means and give it to the people. The masses own this, they get to make your politics whatever they want. Generally, if you need to lie, you are serving incorrect interest, but, that's the system, you need to lie. If you're doing something, anything at all, you need to keep it a secret you need to shroud it in lies. Now everybody knows no matter what you're serving incorrect interest. I still don't think you need to lie, if you're serving correct interest you need to explain not lie, I don't think the right kind of minds get into politics.
Of course, at all times in war you must frame yourself as the moral hero, and this goes beyond democracy but it is especially prevalent in democracy. You're committing an action that would be seen by your populace as on the side of the black and white evil when we thought we were on the side of the black and white good. Explaining to them the realities of war automatically decwares you on da' side of bwack and white evowl. Well you're going to do it anyway, this action may well lead to victory, this action may well end up saving more lives than it costs, but, now look at yourself in history, evil darkness and secrets, you committed a war action, we can't idealize you at all anymore, you are now under the veil of darkness within history. But, you knew, that's the system, we don't tell the people these things they can't handle them. You probably did so with a very incorrect attitude, you probably did so feeling very moral hero not feeling very condescending prick.